Are You Paying Excessive 401(k) Fees?

For most people who work outside the public sector, traditionally defined benefit company pension plans funding a large part of their retirement income are a relic of the past. Instead, these individuals now largely must fund their own retirement nest eggs, supplemented by Social Security. One tax-favored investment vehicle offered by approximately 483,000 businesses to 78 million employees is the 401(k) plan.

A 401(k) plan allows individuals to make tax-deductible contributions from voluntary salary reductions of $16,500 ($21,500 for those 50 and older) per year into a tax deferred investment account. Employers may match employee contributions up to a certain level if they choose. Earnings and investment gains grow tax-deferred. When a participant eventually withdraws funds, he/she pays income tax on the amount of those withdrawals (and a 10% penalty for withdrawals before age 59 ½). If a participant leaves the employer, he/she may roll over the account to an individual personal IRA or perhaps to a new employer’s 401(k) while maintaining the tax-deferred status of the funds.

The employer often hires a third party administrator to oversee the fund. Investment choices within plans can run the gamut from mutual funds, variable annuities, individual stocks, bonds, money markets, pooled Guaranteed Investment Contract (GIC) funds to company stock, among others. Some plans offer very limited investment funding choices coupled with infrequent opportunity to switch investment choices within the plan. Other plans offer a wide range of investment choices with great flexibility to switch investments within the plan.

401(k) plans have become a tremendously important funding source for retirement today and in the future. The generous contribution limits and tax-deferred status enable participants to build up sizeable balances by the time they are ready to retire.

Unfortunately, many plans are not well-managed and cheat participants by charging excessive fees which lower fund performance or by offering inappropriate investment choices. Moreover, many plans do not clearly disclose fees and costs. Plans may have conflicts of interest between fund advisers, administrators, and sponsors of which participants may be unaware. While contributions to your account and the earnings on your investments will increase the amount of retirement income you will receive from your 401(k) plan, fees and expenses paid by your plan may dramatically reduce the growth in your account. According to the U.S. Government Accountability Office, the Congressional investigatory office, even a seemingly small difference in the fees that employees pay can make an enormous difference in the overall size of their 401(k) balances. For example, a 1 percentage point difference in fees can reduce retirement benefits by nearly 20 percent. Excessive fees and poor investment choices which reduce your 401(k) balance may mean you will have to work longer before you are able to retire comfortably, if at all.

If your 401(k) plan charges high fees, has performed poorly, fails to disclose conflicts of interests between the fund sponsor, advisors, or administrators, or offers inappropriate, limited investment choices, your legal rights under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) may have been violated. The federal ERISA statute imposes very strict duties on fiduciaries of 401(k) plans and makes them liable in money damages to plan participants if they violate those duties. If you believe that your 401(k) plan has been subject to such conduct, please contact us to discuss your legal options.

Your Employer May Be Violating Your Legal Rights In Its Administration Of Your 401(k) Retirement Plan

In a posting on this blog, dated December 14, 2010, we reported regarding an alarming trend in which private sector companies offering employees self-funded 401(k) retirement plans breach their legal duties to their employees by, for example, mismanaging the plans, offering poor or too limited investment options, or failing to monitor or offer alternatives to investments that charge excessive fees.  Our research shows that this widespread trend is continuing and may well be illegally affecting your ability to retire on time, comfortably or at all.

For many employees whose private-sector employers do not offer traditional pension plans, an employer-sponsored 401(k) plan may be their only legitimate option for saving for their retirement.  These plans should make saving substantial sums for retirement fairly easy for employees because the IRS permits employees to defer taxation on a percentage of their annual earnings kept in a 401(k) Plan until they have reached a minimum of 59 1/2 years of age. 

The employers offering these plans, including major, reputable large corporations, and the administrators they hire to run these plans for them are regulated "fiduciaries" who have strict duties, under a federal law called "ERISA", to treat 401(k) Plan participants well and fairly.  Many employers are not living up to their legal obligation with respect to the 401(k) offerings they make available to their employees.

If you believe your employer is not offering quality, sufficient, diverse investment options for your 401(k) Plan; or if your employer's plan seems poorly managed, such as where the investments offered charges excessive fees, which cut into your investment return, your rights may have been violated and you may be entitled to share in money damages for your employer's wrongdoing.  We would welcome an opportunity to discuss your legal options and encourage you to contact us about this important issue affecting your retirement.

Back-Dating Options And 401k Plans: Do Employees Have A Right To Sue?

If you’re an employee with a 401k plan that has in it shares in the company you work for, and the executives of your company back-date their stock options -- thereby decreasing the value of your company’s shares and the value of your 401k plan -- do you have a right to sue for violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”)?  Apparently you do, and many employees in this identical situation have done so.

Backdating takes place when executives change the award date of previously granted stock options in shares of their own company so that their securities are worth more -- sometimes tens of millions of dollars more.  For example, Monster Worldwide has at last put an end to a prolonged stock-option-backdating scandal that cost the company tens of millions of dollars and resulted in the criminal convictions of two former senior officials.  The New York based company agreed to pay $4.3 million to a group of employees who held Monster stock in their 401(k) plans.  These employees sued alleging violations of ERISA and contending they had bought shares in their 401k plans while their bosses -- Monster Worldwide executives -- made false disclosures about Monster's financial condition and illegally lined their pockets with back-dated stock option grants.

This boardroom version of creative writing took place at dozens of companies, including at Grand Theft Auto publisher Take-Two Interactive Software, Comverse Technology and Cablevision Systems, as well as many other companies based in Silicon Valley.

The practice seems to have been especially pervasive at Monster, where backdating options apparently went on for nearly a decade before being uncovered in 2006.  The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed civil fraud charges against the company's former chief executive, president, general counsel and controller.   In fact, Monster's former president, James Treacy, was convicted on criminal fraud charges and was sentenced to two years in prison.  And Monster's former general counsel, Myron Olesnykckyj, pleaded guilty to criminal fraud charges in 2007 and is scheduled to be sentenced in February, 2010.

If you are an employee with a 401k plan that has in it shares of your own company, and know or believe that executives in your company have back-dated their stock options, please contact us to discuss your legal options.